Reviewers provide an objective assessment of a submitted manuscript, and recommend whether a piece of work advances the field sufficiently to warrant authenticated publication.
GRF Publishers follows ‘Double-blind’ peerreviewing - conceals both the authors’ and reviewers’ identities, to avoid potential bias against prestigiousauthors and influential authors who are judged on the paper rather than their reputation.
Almost all papers ubmitted to reviewers for consideration will ultimately be accepted for publication or rejection; occasionally an author will withdraw their paper prior to have taken a decision. The best papers are innovative, well-researched, well-written and an asset to the respective journal field as it can set up a milestone in the field of scientific progress.
A. Major or Minor Revision: Common procedure under reviewing followed considering factors like Englishcomprehension, references editing, results explanation, figure reformatting etc.
B. Reviewer Rejection: Reviewers have the capacity to make rejection for the manuscript if it is based on falsehood approach of presentation and scientific concept is not proven.
C. Acceptance: These manuscripts are acceptable as submitted if they are well written, easy to understand, if results support the conclusion, and they add to existing published knowledge extensively.
Global Research Federation is an emerging scientific online open access publisher keeping a goal to serve professional and academic communities in latest research discoveries and developments.