Annals of Medical & Surgical Case Reports

(ISSN 2652-4414)

Research Article

Ankle-brachial index in the study of the prevalence of peripheral artery disease in the Uzbek population

Rozikhodjaeva G1*, Aytimova G 2, Ikramova Z 3, Avezov A2 and Rozikhodjaeva F4

1Department of Diagnostic, Central Clinical Hospital, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

2Urgench branch of Tashkent’s Medical Academia, Urgench, Uzbekistan

3Tashkent Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

4Tashkent Pediatric Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

*Corresponding author: Gulnora Rozikhodjaeva. Department of Diagnostic, Central Clinical Hospital, Uzbekistan, Tel: +998998024032; Email: gulnoradm@inbox.ru

Citation: Rozikhodjaeva G, Aytimova G, Ikramova Z, Avezov A Rozikhodjaeva F (2020) Ankle-brachial index in the study of the prevalence of peripheral artery disease in the Uzbek population. Ann Med & Surg Case Rep: AMSCR-100040

Received date: 31 December, 2019; Accepted date: 04 January, 2020; Published date: 10 January, 2020

 

Abstract

The available information on the epidemiology of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is fragmentary and contradictory and does not give a complete picture of the prevalence of this process in different regions, among different age and ethnic groups. There is no data on the epidemiology of PAD of the lower extremities among the indigenous people from 45 to 90 years of the Khorezm region (Uzbekistan). The use of ABI for screening of PAD is especially justified in elderly patients with atherosclerosis or who have a high cardiovascular risk, which is important for secondary prevention.


Keywords: Ankle-brachial index; Khorezm region; Peripheral artery disease; Prevalence

Introduction

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and associated [1-4] with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death [5-16]. PAD is strongly associated with future cardiovascular events, even among people with PAD with no clinically evident cardiovascular disease [1-6]. Low ABI (≤ 0.90) was associated with an increased risk of adult mortality>= 65 [13,10]. Only 1/3 of patients with PAD have a typical intermittent claudication, 2/3 of the patients are asymptomatic. Data suggest that the prevalence among men aged > 65 to 74 years is 10.3% to 12.1% in the general population in high-income countries [7] and that prevalence increases significantly with age [3,5,6,10,12]. Despite this, the disease remains undiagnosed for a long time, and only one third of these patients are identified [8, 9]. The available information on the prevalence of PAD is fragmentary and contradictory, which does not give a complete picture of the prevalence of this process in different regions, among different age and ethnic groups. The prevalence of PAD in the general population of the Khorezm region is not exactly known, primarily due to the lack of data on the prevalence of asymptomatic PAD.

This study is aimed at assessing the diagnostic value of ABI among adult residents of the Khorezm region aged 45-90 years.

Materials and Methods

502 indigenous subjects of the Khorezm region of Uzbekistan from 45 to 90 years old were included in the cross-sectional population survey (Table 1). Clinical-anamnestic, demographic and instrumental data were collected at the beginning of the study. In addition to examination, palpation and auscultation, the basic vascular examination includes Doppler ultrasound measurement of pressure in the supine position and calculation of the ankle-brachial index. The systolic pressure of A. dorsalis pedis, A. tibialis posterior was measured on an ultrasound machine using a linear transducer (5-10 MHz). An ABI was calculated for each leg as the ratio of systolic blood pressure on the ankle (the highest SBP obtained on A. dorsalis pedis or A. tibialis posterior) and the A. brachialis. PAD was defined as ABI <0.9 [14]. If PAD was diagnosed, an additional questionnaire including history of earlier cardiovascular events (stroke, angina pectoris, and myocardial infarction) was administered, and cardiovascular preventive actions were taken.

Results

Among the 502 subjects examined, 149 (29.7%) had PAD (Table 2) The mean age was 69.7+6.4 years. The 149 participants with PAD differed markedly in their baseline parameters compared with participants with no PAD. Those with PAD were older and more often current smokers (6.7% vs 2.3%). A higher proportion of participants with PAD was diagnosed with hypertension and diabetes. The only variable that was not significantly different for the two groups was BMI. The mean BMI was 27.6 kg / m2+\-9.7 kg / m2). 32 patients with ABI< 0.9 (21.5%) and 69 patients with normal values of ABI (19.5%) (p <0.005) had diagnosed hypertension. 29 patients with PAD (19.5%) and 24 no PAD (6.8%) had diabetes mellitus (p> 0.05). At the time of screening, 10 patients with PAD (6.7%) and 8 patients no PAD (2.3%) were current smokers (p <0.05).

The average value of ABI in the examined cohort of patients was 0.92+0.23, and was <0.9 in 29.7% of patients. The average ABI decreased with age. In elderly patients (60-74 years) and senile age (75 and >), the ABI values were 0.96+0.18 and 0.86+0.13, respectively (p <0.05). Many more elderly and senile patients (45%) had pathological ABI compared with middle-aged patients (45-59 years) (10%). Patients in older age groups were more likely to suffer from asymptomatic PAD and, therefore, benefited more from screening. The frequency of detected cases in the studied regions is shown in the Table 3.

Discussion

The prevalence and severity of atherosclerosis in different geographical regions differ significantly, due to the influence of environmental factors, climate, diet, lifestyle [10,17,18,20]. In this regard, regional studies of atherosclerosis are of great interest.

PAD is a common problem in older people, especially with diabetes. An effective and at the same time insufficiently used method today is the dopplerographic determination of ankle-brachial index (ABI), calculated as the ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) on A. dorsalis pedis or A. tibialis posterior) and the A. brachialis [13,15,17,20]. The experience of using ABI as a method for screening PAD has also allowed us to identify the causes of possible measurement errors. Errors were often associated with the presence of media sclerosis in patients with diabetes mellitus, the presence of leg edema, incorrect blood pressure measurements, problems with cuff application, and sensor movement during measurement. When taking into account the regional characteristics of the areas of residence, the proportion of patients with PAD was somewhat in individuals with increased salt intake (more than 15g/day), a history of smoking, senile age (75 years and older), burdened by heredity for cardiovascular diseases, arterial hypertension, hypodynamie (χ2 9,7, p<0,01).

Conclusion

The use of ABI for screening of PAD is especially justified in elderly patients with atherosclerosis or who have a high cardiovascular risk, which is important for secondary prevention. The use of targeted ultrasound screening of the PAD showed an important information content of the ankle - brachial index and a direct relationship between the frequency of PAD and cardiovascular risk factors. With an increase in the number of risk factors, the likelihood of developing PAD increases.


Figures


 

?

area of residence

Age/sex

 

n/%

45-59 ???

60-74 ???

75-90 ???

male

n

female n

male

n

female

n

male

n

female

n

1.

Urgench city

52 (10,4%)

6

5

19

13

5

4

2.

Urgench district

51 (10,0%)

5

6

17

14

5

4

3.

Honka District

45 (9,0%)

5

4

16

12

4

4

4.

Bogot district

47 (9,4%)

5

4

17

13

5

3

5.

Khazorasp district

44 (8,8%)

5

3

16

12

4

4

6.

Yangiarik district

46 (9,0%)

5

4

16

14

4

3

7.

Khiva district

42 (8,4%)

4

3

16

12

4

3

8.

Kushkupir district

44 (8,8%)

5

4

17

11

4

3

9.

Shavat district

45 (9,0%)

5

4

16

13

4

3

10.

Yangibozor district

42 (8,4%)

5

4

15

12

3

3

11.

Gurlan district

44 (8,8%)

5

4

16

13

3

3

Total

55

45

181

139

45

37

-

502 (male/female= 281/221)

Table 1: Distribution of all studied subjects, depending on the sex, age and area of residence.

 

Parameters

With Pad(n 149)

No PAD (n 353)

By Age

Mean age, years

Mean (SD)

70,9 (10,3)

67,8 (11,7)

45-59

n ( %)

15(10,0%)

85(24,1%)

60-74

n (%)

112 (75,2%)

208 (58,9%)

>/= 75

n (%)

22 (14,8%)

60 (17,0%)

Gender, male

n (%)

281 (70,1%)

83 (69,1%)

By area of residence

Urgench city

n (%)

15(10,1%)

37(10,5%)

Urgench district

n (%)

16 (10,7%)

35 (9,9%)

Honka District

n (%)

13 (8,7%)

32(9,1%)

Bogot district

n (%)

16(10,7%)

31(8,8%)

Khazorasp district

n (%)

11(7,4%)

33(9,3%)

Yangiarik district

n (%)

15(10,1%)

31(8,8%)

Khiva district

n (%)

13 (8,7%)

29 (8,2%)

Kushkupir district

n (%)

14(9,4%)

30(8,5%)

Shavat district

n (%)

12 (8,1%)

33 (9,3%)

Yangibozor district

n (%)

11(7,4%)

31(8,8%)

Gurlan district

n (%)

13(8,7%)

31(8,8%)

Table 2: Contribution of patients with PAD and no PAD by age and sex.

 

ABI

Total (n-502)

0,5

6 (1,2%)

0,5-0,7

39 (7,8%)

0,7-0,9

104 (20,7%)

0,9-1,1

248 (49,4%)

1,1-1,3

79 (15,7%)

>1,3

26 (5,2%)

Table 3: Ankle-brachial index (ABI).


  1. Aboyan V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, Björck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, et al. (2018) 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEndorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J 39: 763-816.
  2. Collins R, Burch J, Cranny G, Aguiar-Ibanez R, Craig D, et al. (2007) Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: systematic review. BMJ 334: 1257.
  3. Cooke JP and Chen Z (2015) A compendium on peripheral arterial disease. Circ. Res 116: 1505-1508.
  4. Criqui MH and Aboyans V (2015) Epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease. Circ Res 116: 1509-1526.
  5. Dhaliwal G and Mukherjee D (2007) Peripheral arterial disease: epidemiology, natural history, diagnosis and treatment. Int. J. Angiol 16: 36-44.
  6. Diehm C, Lange S, Darius H, Pittrow D, von Stritzky B, et al. (2006) Association of low ankle brachial index with high mortality in primary care. Eur Heart J 27: 1743-1749.
  7. Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, et al. (2013) Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet 382: 1329-1340.
  8. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, et al. (2017) 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 135: e686-e725.
  9. Gornik HL and Beckman JA (2005) Cardiology patient page. Peripheral arterial disease. Circulation 111: e169-172.
  10. Höbaus C, Herz CT, Obendorf F, Howanietz MT, Wrba T, et al. (2017) Center-based patient care enhances survival of elderly patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease. Ann Med 49: 291-298.
  11. Jens S, Koelemay MJ, Reekers JA, Bipat S (2013) Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 23: 3104-3114.
  12. www.esvs.org
  13. Lin JS, Olson CM, Johnson ES, Whitlock EP (2013) The ankle-brachial index for peripheral artery disease screening and cardiovascular disease prediction among asymptomatic adults: asystematic evidence review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 159: 333-341.
  14. http://www.angiolsurgery.org/society/organisations/esvs/guidelines/Atherosclerotic-Carotid-and-Vertebral-Artery-2017.pdf
  15. Niazi K, Khan TH, Easley KA (2006) Diagnostic utility of the two methods of ankle brachial index in the detection of peripheral arterial disease of lower extremities. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68: 788-792.
  16. Pollak AW, Norton PT, Kramer CM (2012) Multimodality imaging of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease: current role and future directions. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5: 797-807.
  17. Rozikhodjaeva G and Aytimova G (2018) Peculiarities of Diagnostics of Lower Extremities Peripheral Artery Disease in Geriatric Patients. European Journal of Medicine. Series B 5: 61-67.
  18. Rozikhodjaev G (2011) Diagnostic Approaches to Estimate the Functional Status of the Cardiovascular System in Elderly patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 37: 158.
  19. Sigvant B, Lundin F, Wahlberg E (2016) The Risk of Disease Progression in Peripheral Arterial Disease is Higher than Expected: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality and Disease Progression in Peripheral Arterial Disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 51: 395-403.
  20. Xu D, Zou L, Xing Y, Hou L, Wei Y, et al. (2013) Diagnostic value of ankle-brachial index in peripheral arterial disease: a metaanalysis. Can J Cardiol 29: 492-498.

Citation: Rozikhodjaeva G, Aytimova G, Ikramova Z, Avezov A Rozikhodjaeva F (2020) Ankle-brachial index in the study of the prevalence of peripheral artery disease in the Uzbek population. Ann Med & Surg Case Rep: AMSCR-100040